lkva/NDOJ
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Use DB field instead of cache for contest summary

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
cuom1999 2023-11-24 00:35:38 -06:00
parent 159b2b4cc0
commit b2a91af011
5 changed files with 97 additions and 55 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

50
judge/migrations/0174_contest_summary_result.py Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Generated by Django 3.2.18 on 2023-11-24 05:45
from django.db import migrations, models
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
dependencies = [
("judge", "0173_fulltext"),
]
operations = [
migrations.AddField(
model_name="contestssummary",
name="results",
field=models.JSONField(blank=True, null=True),
),
migrations.AlterField(
model_name="contest",
name="authors",
field=models.ManyToManyField(
help_text="These users will be able to edit the contest.",
related_name="_judge_contest_authors_+",
to="judge.Profile",
verbose_name="authors",
),
),
migrations.AlterField(
model_name="contest",
name="curators",
field=models.ManyToManyField(
blank=True,
help_text="These users will be able to edit the contest, but will not be listed as authors.",
related_name="_judge_contest_curators_+",
to="judge.Profile",
verbose_name="curators",
),
),
migrations.AlterField(
model_name="contest",
name="testers",
field=models.ManyToManyField(
blank=True,
help_text="These users will be able to view the contest, but not edit it.",
related_name="_judge_contest_testers_+",
to="judge.Profile",
verbose_name="testers",
),
),
]