skyfall/rtl8188eu
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/lwfinger/rtl8188eu.git synced 2025-05-09 14:53:05 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

rtl8188eu: Fix C90 comments in include/*.h

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
This commit is contained in:
Larry Finger 2013-08-11 23:36:23 -05:00
parent 49ab4b6c4f
commit f9d86b986b
81 changed files with 3809 additions and 3960 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
include/rtw_p2p.h
View file

@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int rtw_p2p_enable(struct adapter *padapter, enum P2P_ROLE role);
static inline void _rtw_p2p_set_state(struct wifidirect_info *wdinfo, enum P2P_STATE state)
{
if (wdinfo->p2p_state != state) {
//wdinfo->pre_p2p_state = wdinfo->p2p_state;
/* wdinfo->pre_p2p_state = wdinfo->p2p_state; */
wdinfo->p2p_state = state;
}
}
@ -106,11 +106,11 @@ static inline bool _rtw_p2p_chk_role(struct wifidirect_info *wdinfo, enum P2P_RO
#define rtw_p2p_findphase_ex_set(wdinfo, value) \
(wdinfo)->find_phase_state_exchange_cnt = (value)
//is this find phase exchange for social channel scan?
/* is this find phase exchange for social channel scan? */
#define rtw_p2p_findphase_ex_is_social(wdinfo) \
(wdinfo)->find_phase_state_exchange_cnt >= P2P_FINDPHASE_EX_SOCIAL_FIRST
//should we need find phase exchange anymore?
/* should we need find phase exchange anymore? */
#define rtw_p2p_findphase_ex_is_needed(wdinfo) \
((wdinfo)->find_phase_state_exchange_cnt < P2P_FINDPHASE_EX_MAX && \
(wdinfo)->find_phase_state_exchange_cnt != P2P_FINDPHASE_EX_NONE)